Legal Opinion
Flaum v. Birnbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Denman, P. J.
Petitioners are Janice Birnbaum, llene Flaum, and Central Trust Company, who are, respectively, a suspended coexecutrix and the temporary coadministrators of the estate of Bernard P. Birnbaum (hereinafter the estate). The original respondent was Saul Birnbaum (Saul), a suspended coexecutor of the estate, but since Saul’s death on April 20, 1991, Victoria Birnbaum, Saul’s widow and the executrix of his estate, has been substituted as the respondent. This proceeding focuses on allegations of conversion, fraud and self-dealing by Saul in a series of transactions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Birnbaum v. BirnbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Crow v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Wood v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Birnbaum v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Galyn v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Skaneateles Savings Bank v. Modi AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Blissett v. EisensmidtDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Doe v. IndykeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- In re the Estate of SkeeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005