Legal Opinion
Doe v. Indyke
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 28, 2020No. 1:19-cv-10758Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARY DOE, Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10758 (PAE) -v- OPINION & ORDER DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and SARAH VICKERS, Defendants. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: In this diversity action, plaintiff Mary Doe1 brings tort claims under New York law against, inter alia, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein (“Indyke and Kahn” or “the executor defendants”). The executor defendants now move to dismiss Doe’s claim against them for punitive…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.