Legal Opinion

Millner v. Millner

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

(I)

The plaintiff — successful in her suit before me for a separation on the ground of inadequate support and abandonment — has moved to amend the findings made and the judgment rendered after trial so as to increase the allowances granted to her.

In her submission, the plaintiff alleges that her husband is a person of considerable wealth and income, and argues that I overlooked that factor in my decision. I did not. The fact is that, in her desire to obtain the result sought, the plaintiff has fallen into the error of de-emphasizing entirely the preseparation standard of living of the parties—…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. McMains v. McMainsNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. People Ex Rel. Commissioners of Public Charities & Correction v. CullenNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conner v. ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Hummel v. HummelNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Hedaya v. HedayaNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API