Legal Opinion

In Re C.D.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 2016No. 2 CA-JV 2015-0183PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STARING, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant C.D. contends the juvenile court erred in adjudicating him delinquent on a felony charge of shoplifting pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1805(1), based on his having committed two or more previous shoplifting offenses. C.D. argues the statute cannot constitutionally apply to juveniles because it does not state that prior shoplifting adjudications may be used as predicate offenses for the felony classification. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court’s finding that he had two prior delinquency adjudications based on shoplifting and had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PennyeArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Marlar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State v. ConsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. KozlowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. State v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re J.U.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. State v. MartensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API