Legal Opinion

Frederick v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1985PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously modified by reinstating plaintiff’s first and fourth causes of action and the third-party action and granting a new trial on said causes of action and otherwise judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s complaint alleges causes of action in negligence, breach of implied and express warranty and strict liability against Niagara Machine & Tool Works (Niagara). Niagara brought a third-party action against McGraw Edison (McGraw), plaintiff’s employer, seeking indemnification. At the close of plaintiff’s proof, the court, without objection,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Burke v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  3. Bukowski v. CooperVision Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Andrulonis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  5. Stiles v. Batavia Atomic Horseshoes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API