Nehrebecki v. Mull
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Eagen,
This is a personal injury and property damage action arising out of an automobile collision. The jury specifically found that the defendant was not guilty of negligence and returned a verdict in his favor. The court en banc below granted a new trial ruling that the verdict was “capricious and against the weight of the evidence and resulted in a miscarriage of justice.” The defendant appeals.
We have repeatedly said that we will not reverse the grant of a new trial, unless there was a clear abuse of discretion, or an error of law which controlled the outcome of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Segriff v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Ratcliff v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Spang & Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Armbruster v. HorowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Westinghouse Elevator Co. v. HerronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.