Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Ball Bros. Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 1933No. 14,920PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDudine, J.
— John Omer Mitchell was employed by appellee as a shop foreman. He was an expert me chanic, and his work was to make repairs, changes, and installations of machinery in the various buildings, in the city of Muneie, used by appellee in the manufacture of glass fruit jars, zinc products, and paper products. These buildings were in close proximity to each other, but were not in the same city block. Mitchell had to cross Twelfth Street from time to time in the performance of his duties, in going from one building to the other.
His usual time to get to work was about 6:30 A. M., and his usual time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. PurcellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Jeffries v. Pitman-Moore Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Rogers v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Kokomo Steel & Wire Co. v. IrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Moore v. Sefton Manufacturing Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reed v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
- Goldstone v. KozmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Bowen v. KeenSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Horn v. SANDHILL FURNITURE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Miller v. BARRETTIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.