Legal Opinion

Moore v. Sefton Manufacturing Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1924No. 11,918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Application by appellant for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The board found that the injury for which compensation was asked did not arise out of and in the course of the employment. From an award denying compensation, appellant appeals and contends that the undisputed evidence shows his injury arose out of and in the course of his employment.

The controlling facts are, in substance, as follows: Appellee was engaged in the business of manufacturing boxes in the city of Anderson, where it employed a large number of persons, one of whom was appellant, who, on the day of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cox's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Schweiss v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. Pitman-Moore Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Reed v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Goldstone v. KozmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Horn v. SANDHILL FURNITURE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API