Texas Compensation Insurance Co. v. Matthews
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Justice.
This workmen’s compensation case was tried without a jury on an agreed statement of facts. The sole question in the trial court was whether plaintiff’s injuries were sustained in the course of her employment. The trial court held that they were, and we affirm.
Plaintiff was injured on two occasions when crossing a street on the way from her parking lot to her place of employment. She was employed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company at its building on the southeast corner of Haskell and Bryan Streets in Dallas. Normally she had no occasion to cross Bryan Street on her way…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- McDaniel Bros. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Kampmann v. RothwellTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ross v. Texas One Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Texas Compensation Insurance Co. v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Texas Compensation Insurance Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Texas Compensation Insurance Co. v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Texas Compensation Insurance Co. v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1974