Legal Opinion

Horandt v. Rosenthal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 13, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*475The opinion of the court was delivered by

Teeüstchaed, J.

This writ of error brings up a judgment upon a verdict directed for the defendant at the Bergen Circuit.

The action was brought by the administrator of Frank Horandt, deceased, to recover damages for his death.

The gravamen of the action is the failure of the defendant to warn and instruct the decedent of the dangers of the work in which he was engaged, which were known to the defendant and unknown to the decedent.

The evidence upon the part of the plaintiff at the trial would iiave justified the jury in finding the matters of fact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Smith v. IrwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  3. Card v. WilkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ludwig v. KirbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API