Legal Opinion
Fair Employment & Housing Commission v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 2004No. B167641PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Fair Employment and Housing Commission (the Commission) seeks a peremptory writ of mandate directing respondent Los Angeles County Superior Court to vacate its order overruling the Commission’s demurrer in favor of petitioners in the underlying action and real parties Las Brisas Apartments, Ltd. Partnership (Las Brisas) and Pico Union Housing Corporation (Pico), a general partner of Las Brisas. We conclude that Las Brisas and Pico failed to file the underlying petition within the 30-day statute of limitations set forth in Government Code section 11523 1 and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Fogarty v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- California Standardbred Sires Stakes Committee, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grewal v. JammuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Capitol Racing, LLC v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cockshott v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of San Diego v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.