Legal Opinion
Pomeroy v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided September 22, 1959No. Claim No. 34125; Claim No. 34455PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.
The above-entitled and numbered claims were filed to recover damages for property appropriated by the State of New York for Oswego Boulevard in the City of Syracuse, New York. Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law have been filed on behalf of both claimants and the State.
The owners and lessee are entitled to compensation for such damages under these appropriations.
The claimants, Donald T. Pomeroy, Samuel N. McCain, Donald P. Mullin and Robert J. Conan were the sole owners in fee of the property affected.
The B. P. Goodrich Company is a lessee of the entire property, and its lease…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- In Re the Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn Bridge to Acquire Lands of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Schreiber v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marraro v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Village of Highland Falls v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Garfield Homes, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964
- Mazur Bros. Realty, LLC v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.