Legal Opinion
Village of Highland Falls v. State
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 1978No. Claim 55085PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Breitel.
In an eminent domain proceeding, appellant Village of Highland Falls sought compensation for temporary and permanent appropriations of property by the State. The subject property is land improved by a water treatment facility. On this appeal, claimant village challenges only the Appellate Division’s reduction of the Court of Claims’ award for the taking of a temporary easement.
In dispute is whether the damages suffered as a result of the State’s appropriation of a temporary easement may be determined retrospectively, or whether the determination of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Wolfe v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re the Estate of EckartNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Freidus v. EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rockland Development Associates v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Kadlec v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- McCurdy v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.