Legal Opinion

Bender v. Bender

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1978No. 1602PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

After having once awarded custody of a now six year old girl, Heather, to her father, the lower court then awarded custody to her mother. We reverse and remand for both procedural and substantive reasons. As a matter of procedure: the lower court made the change in custody on the basis of evidence not in the record; also, we do not have the comprehensive opinion that we must have in a custody case. As a matter of substance: the evidence that is of record strongly suggests that the court’s earlier award of custody to the father was in Heather’s best interest.

It is settled that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gunter v. GunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Holschuh v. Holland-MoritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Parikh v. ParikhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Ulmer v. UlmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Matter of TerwilligerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Hartman v. HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. McCourt v. MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Bender v. BenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Harner v. HarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API