Gunter v. Gunter
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
This is an appeal from an order changing the custody of a seven year old boy, whose name is David, from his mother to his father. The order must be set aside and the record remanded with a procedendo. There are two reasons for this conclusion. First, the hearing judge relied on David’s statement that he would prefer to be with his father; this statement, however, was not transcribed. Second, the testimony presented to the judge was most incomplete; nor does the judge’s opinion assist us in appraising it. Because of these deficiencies we cannot in good conscience say…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth ex rel. Holschuh v. Holland-MoritzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Parikh v. ParikhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Stapleton v. Dauphin County Child Care ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth ex rel. Ulmer v. UlmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Albright v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. FettersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- In the Interest of LaRueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Com. Ex Rel. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.