Legal Opinion

Carvel Corp. v. Rait

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1986PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The defendant was licensed to operate a Carvel ice cream store in Franklin Square, Nassau County, New York, and the term of the license agreement ran to October 31, 1984. Although the plaintiff Carvel Corporation (hereinafter Carvel) declined to renew the agreement, it is undisputed that the defendant continued to operate a retail ice cream store after that date at the same location as the former Carvel store.

Carvel commenced an action seeking, among other things, a permanent injunction against the defendant pursuant to the terms of paragraph 31 of the license agreement,…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by28 opinions

  1. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  2. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New York City Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  4. Volunteer Firemen's Insurance Services v. Cigna Property & Casualty Insurance AgencySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Lui v. Park Ridge at Terryville Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API