Legal Opinion

Pulley v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 11, 1979No. 1291, September Term, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

At issue is the constitutionality of Maryland Rule 736 as applied to the appellant in this case, Rodney King Pulley. In what amounted to his fourth jeopardy, the appellant was convicted by a Baltimore City jury, presided over by Judge Elsbeth L. Bothe, of felony murder and the use of a handgun in the commission of a felony. The significant contention, of the three here raised by the appellant, is that Judge Bothe erroneously refused to rule on the merits of the appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on grounds of double jeopardy..

Before moving on to the law, we would set the stage…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Green v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. State v. TorresCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Carbaugh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API