Legal Opinion

Pulley v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 1980No. [No. 81, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

We granted certiorari in this criminal cause to determine: 1) what time constraints, if any, are validly imposed by Maryland Rule 736, or otherwise, on a defendant asserting a claim that the pending prosecution against him is barred by the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution; and 2) whether, upon an immediate appeal being noted from the pretrial denial of such a claimed fifth amendment bar, a trial on the general issue conducted to final conclusion during the pendency of that appeal is a nullity. Since, even assuming that the time requirements of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. First Federated Commodity Trust Corp. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API