Hamilton v. State

ALPERT, Judge.

Raymond Hamilton, appellant herein, feels aggrieved by the methods employed by the Maryland State Police in investigating the murder of one Frank Siejack. He contends, in this appeal, that the police violated his constitutional rights by taping conversations between himself and his acquaintances who, at the time, were acting as State agents. Upon a review of the record and applicable case law we, as the court below, find no such violation. We explain.

Appellant’s convictions 1 in the case sub judice are in connection with the shooting of Frank Siejack in Queen Anne’s County,…