Legal Opinion

United States v. Microsoft Corp.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 29, 1999No. 17-1181PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Publicity in Taking Evidence Act of 1913 provides that depositions of witnesses for use in any suit in equity brought by the Government under the Sherman Act “shall be open to the public as freely as are'trials in open court.” 15 U.S.C. § 30. Microsoft Corporation, the defendant in such an antitrust case, appeals the district court’s order requiring the depositions in this case to be taken in public, subject to provisions for the protection of trade secrets and other confidential business information. Microsoft…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Belizan, Monica v. Hershon, SimonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Ramírez Rodríguez v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Halasa v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. In re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Rohrbough v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API