Legal Opinion
Piedmont Cotton Mills, Inc. v. General Warehouse No. Two, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 26, 1966No. 23438PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cook, Justice.
It was not error to overrule the general demurrers to the petition, which alleged the diversion of a stream from its channel by the defendants on the property of the defendant corporation, resulting in injury to the property of the petitioner by flooding. 1Code §§ 85-1301, 105-1407.
The only special demurrers urged by the defendants are those attacking the allegations in regard to a malicious tort of the defendants, and the allegations with reference to the measure of damages claimed by the petitioner. It is alleged that the defendant T. W. Tift, “individually and as an officer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Frazier v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Foster v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Barham v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- City of Warner Robins v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Sheppard v. Tribble Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Hines v. Good Housekeeping ShopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.