Legal Opinion

SFB Corp. v. Cambridge Automatic, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 1, 2002No. 015304PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, A.J.

This is a suit on a note. It is complicated, if at all, by the fact that the noteholder is a corporation controlled by one George Burnell, who was, at the time the note was executed, the President, CEO, and a director of the defendant. The defendant argues (a) that the Note was merged into a láter-signed Employment Agreement between it and Burnell, and (b) that the plaintiffs claim on the note should be equitably subordinated to the claims of defendant’s other, non-insider creditors.

For the reasons that follow, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.

STATEMENT OF…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Attorney General v. M.C.K., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Suffolk Construction Co. v. Lanco Scaffolding Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Hanson v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API