Legal Opinion

In re Judicial Review by Republican Candidates for Election

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1980No. 7910SC873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Petitioners first contend that the State Board of Elections was without jurisdiction and authority to declare portions of the Clay County General Election void and order a new election for some of the offices on its own motion without an election contest having been filed with it. The record does not indicate that any challenge or complaint had been lodged with the County Board of Elections pursuant to the provisions of 8 N.C.A.C. 2 et seq., and we assume that none had been. It is clear from the record that the hearing was had on the State Board’s own motion. The notice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hirsh v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gardner v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General Ex Rel. Owens v. ChaplinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. In Re Contest of Election of VetschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buonanno v. DiStefanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  2. In Re Appeal of RamseurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. In re Appeal of HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. In re Election of Cleveland County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Frieson v. North Carolina Real Estate Licensing BoardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API