Bank of Houston v. Milam
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Plaintiff sought to recover a deficiency judgment based upon a promissory note, payment of which was secured by a security agreement on personal property of defendants. On April 8, 1992, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs for $57,312.99, interest and attorney’s fee. Defendants appeal.
Review of this nonjury case requires that we give due regard to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of witnesses. Rule 73.01(c)(2). Review is under Rule 73.01(c). As that rule is interpreted, the judgment is to be affirmed unless there is no substantial evidence to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day SaintsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Grue v. HensleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Wilt v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State Bank of Fisk v. Omega Electronics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- First Missouri Bank & Trust Co. of Creve Coeur v. NewmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cordes v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Bank of America v. LallanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Victory Hills Ltd. Partnership I v. Nationsbank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Boulevard Bank v. MalottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Twehous Excavating Co. v. L.L. Lewis Investments, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.