Legal Opinion

Morris v. Aderhold

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1946No. 15645PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Where an application for the writ of habeas corpus affirmatively shows on its face, as here, that the restraint is legal, the judge before whom the writ is made returnable has the power, on general demurrer, to dismiss the writ and remand the applicant. In such instance the general demurrer, under our practice, serves the purpose of a motion to quash the writ for insufficiency of the allegations in the petition. Smith v. Milton, 149 Ga. 28 (98 S. E. 607); Coleman v. Grimes, 154 Ga. 852 (115 S. E. 641); Kinman v. Clark, 185 Ga. 328 (195 S.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wells v. PridgenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Kinman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Shiflett v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. McFarland v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Smith v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loftin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Gandy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Salem v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Reid v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API