Legal Opinion

Bradford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1972No. 47331, 47332PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. In civil cases, Code Ann. § 81A-142 specifically provides for consolidation of trials in actions involving a common question of law or fact, but only if all parties thereto consent. In criminal cases, while no statute expressly deals with the question, the same rule obtains. See 59 ALR2d Anno., 841, 859. Morris v. Aderhold, 201 Ga. 533 (3) (40 SE2d 747) holds that where a party is accused of separate and distinct violations the cases may by agreement be tried jointly, but this cannot be done except by consent. In Sides v. State, 213 Ga. 482, 485 (99 SE2d 884) the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sides v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  2. Bruster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  3. Morris v. AderholdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. McGill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loftin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Chumley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. State v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Snell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API