Legal Opinion

Williams v. Nathan

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 13, 1995No. 1:93-cv-04055PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLEESON, District Judge:

Plaintiff James E. Williams, acting pro se, brought this diversity action against defendant Cynthia R. Nathan, claiming damages for defamation of character. Defendant Nathan, also appearing pro se, has moved to dismiss the claims, or, in the alternative, to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. For the reasons discussed below, the action is dismissed.

BACKGROUND

The litigious relationship between the parties has an elaborate history consisting, for the most part, of actions the plaintiff has filed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Spar, Inc. And Spar Marketing Services, Inc. v. Information Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abalu v. Society of Human Resource ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API