Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2009No. Docket 136298Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partYoung, J.

In this case, we are asked to review the trial court’s certification of a plaintiff class consisting of approximately 2,000 landowners within the flood plain of the Tittabawassee River. The Michigan Court Rules govern the procedure for certifying class actions in Michigan courts. MCR 3.501(A)(1) provides specific prerequisites for proposed plaintiff classes. A party seeking class certification bears the burden of proving that these prerequisites are in fact met and must provide sufficient information to the ruling court for it to make the determination that the prerequisites are met. Because…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API