Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harris

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Plaintiff, as the sublessee of two logging trucks and trailers, brings this action against the sublessor for $2,227 for the cost of repairs which defendant allegedly agreed to pay to put the trucks in proper condition for operation. Plaintiff also sues for $1,720 in repayment of two-thirds of the rental payments made by plaintiff and which were to have been applied as part payment on later purchase of the equipment by plaintiff, which was made impossible by defendant’s default in rental payments under the primary lease. The case was tried before the court, without a jury. Plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. James v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Associated Oil Co. v. La BranchOregon Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Land Reclamation, Inc. v. Riverside CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. National Cash Register Company v. IMC, INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Isosceles Holdings, LLC v. Alliance Environmental Group LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API