State v. Welborn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Counsel for defendant, presumably in deference to the decisions, S. v. Hardy, 209 N.C. 83, 182 S.E. 831, S. v. Lowe, 209 N.C. 846, 183 S.E. 749, and S. v. Carpenter, 215 N.C: 635, 3 S.E. 2d 34, which construe the statute (G.S. 18-11) defining a -dwelling where whisky may be lawfully possessed, said: “Your Honor, we will stipulate that is the whiskey he had in his store.”
Defendant, by motion to nonsuit and exceptions to the charge, presents this question: Was possession of taxpaid whisky in his store when not possessed for sale illegal? Unless we overrule a consistent line of decisions, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FuquaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. . SuddrethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. ShinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958