Legal Opinion

Boldin v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

Plaintiff Otto Boldin was the owner of an automobile, in which he and the plaintiff Karl Boldin were passengers, and which, at the time of the accident, was being driven by another. The owner, of course, was liable for the negligence of his driver ; the other passenger was not. The other car was owned by the defendants Smith and Addis, and operated by an agent of the defendants Lacy, with the consent of the former. If actionable negligence was shown against the defendants’ driver, all defendants were liable.

The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff Karl Boldin, and no cause of action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomson v. United Glazing Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  2. McCarthy v. AnableNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Girou v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Piels v. TronNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Leo v. Reile, New York County Courts1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API