Legal Opinion

State v. Mularkey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

This case was a prosecution of the defendants for a violation of sec. 343.18, Stats., the material part reading as follows:

“Any person who shall take, use and operate any automobile . . . upon any public highway of this state without the consent of the owner thereof shall, upon conviction thereof,” etc.

The facts, as recited in the report of the trial judge, show a hiring by the defendants of an automobile from the owner thereof at Montello in said county to drive to Oxford, to be returned at 7 o’clock the following morning. The car was driven to Fond du Lac, then to Oxford, then to Dalton,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. AlabodaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Eastway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United States v. One 1941 Chrysler Brougham SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
  5. People v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API