Cooper v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHITE, Senior Judge.
The complaint in this case alleges in the first paragraph that the purpose of the action is “to recover damages because the defendant, United States of America, has destroyed private property for public use without paying just compensation in violation of the United States Constitution Amendment Five.”
It is explained later in the complaint that the private property allegedly destroyed consisted of timber located on a 467-acre farm in Itawamba County, Mississippi, the legal description of which is all that portion of Section 11, Township 8 North, Range 8 East, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Hartwig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Lacey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- J.R. Cooper v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Laughlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Gasser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992