Legal Opinion

Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 13, 1992No. Nos. 106-85C, 90-3988CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge:

Plaintiffs, shipping companies, seek to recover fuel cost subsidies, under operating differential subsidy contracts they entered into with the Maritime Administration, De*950partment of Transportation (MarAd). Plaintiffs claim they are entitled to receive these subsidies under the Merchant Marine Act of 1936, as amended, 46 U.S.C.App. § 1173(b) (1970) (amended 1981). The litigation comes before the court on motions for summary judgment wherein plaintiffs challenge determinations by the Maritime Subsidy Board (Board) of the MarAd that they were not entitled to fuel cost…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API