Legal Opinion
Epple v. Clark
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1991No. 89-228PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
This appeal raises a question concerning the liability of a former homeowner to a subsequent homeowner for alleged misrepresentations and fraud relating to the condition of the basement of the house. The subsequent homeowners state the sole issue as:
The trial court erred by ignoring the uncontroverted evidence 'and applying the standard [Restatement (Second) of Torts § 353] when it should have applied [Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552C].
We affirm.
FACTS
In October, 1981, Mr. and Mrs. Michael L. Clark (Clarks) moved into their newly constructed home located in Sheridan,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnston v. Conoco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Pancratz Co. v. Kloefkorn-Ballard Construction/Development, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Jung-Leonczynska v. SteupWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Thatcher & Sons, Inc. v. Norwest Bank Casper, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- V-1 Oil Co. v. RanckWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- WW Enterprises, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Oatts v. JorgensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Amoco Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Hermreck v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Wright v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.