Roxalana Hills, Ltd. v. Masonite Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are several motions requiring consideration prior to trial of this matter. Roxalana seeks yet even more discovery by its motions — all filed after the October 1, 1985, deadline for discovery. Because additional discovery at this juncture would delay the resolution of the action, Plaintiff’s motions for additional discovery are denied as untimely. The Court will next consider Masonite’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Roxalana’s complaint asserts causes of action under tort and Uniform Commercial Code theories. In 1975 Roxalana…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Daitom, Inc. v. Pennwalt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Star Furniture Co. v. Pulaski Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. Page Engineering Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Agristor Leasing v. SpindlerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1987
- Basham v. General ShaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Capitol Fuels, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Controlled Environments Construction, Inc. v. Key Industrial Refrigeration Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.