Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Karnavas

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 16, 2002No. 05-01-01708-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice LAGARDE.

Richard B. Tanner, Jr. appeals a take-nothing judgment rendered on the jury’s verdict that Benjamin Karnavas was not negligent in connection with an automobile collision between Tanner and Karnavas. In six points of error, Tanner contends there was no evidence to support the instruction on unavoidable accident, the jury’s finding was against the great weight and “sufficiency” of the evidence, the trial court committed several evidentiary errors, and the grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Gary and Pam Kar-navas was error. For reasons that follow, we…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Brownsville v. AlvaradoTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. AbleTexas Supreme Court · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. Redbird Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  2. Thompson v. Beyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  3. Fethkenher v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Risinger v. Shuemaker, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  5. Doe I v. Pilgrim Rest Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API