Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1968No. Nos. 17888, 17939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Chief Judge.
These proceedings are to review orders of the Federal Power Commission authorizing the City of Hamilton, Ohio, to change from its present natural gas supplier, The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company (CG&E), to another supplier, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas), whose main transmission system-passes within the city limits of Hamilton.
The basis for the orders was that Texas would supply the gas to Hamilton at a substantially lower rate than CG&E, 'and that the benefits derived by Hamilton from the change in suppliers outweighed, in the public interest, any adverse…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lynchburg Gas Company v. Federal Power Commission, Atlantic Seaboard Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- The Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission, Philadelphia Electric Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Otter Tail Power Company v. Federal Power Commission, and Village of Elbow Lake, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Power Commission, the City of Hamilton, Ohio and Texas Gastransmission Corp., Intervenors. The Ohio Fuel Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968