Legal Opinion

Searchlight Horn Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 22, 1919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the Searchlight Horn Company against the Victor Talking Machine Company. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

The complainant in this suit seeks to restrain the defendant from making, using, or selling phonograph horns infringing claims 2 and 3 of its patent No. 771,441, issued to Peter C.' Nielsen October 4, 1904, which by mesne assignments came into the. possession of the complainant. It further seeks the profits realized by' defendant and damages sustained by complainant on account of said infringement.

■ The defendant denies liability on the ground that: 1. It did not infringe “under any permissible interpretation of the patent.” 2. Thaf the claims of the patent, if not…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  2. Yablick v. Protecto Safety Appliance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  3. Bianchi v. BariliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Pierce v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  5. Mid-Continent Inv. Co. v. Mercoid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API