Legal Opinion
National Advertising Company v. City of Orange
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1988No. 86-6552, 87-5739PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
National Advertising applied for permits to erect billboards in the City of Orange, California. The City denied the applications, and stipulates it did so “solely because of the provisions of the Sign Ordinance prohibiting off-site signs.”
Orange City’s Sign Ordinance bars throughout the City “general or billboard advertising signs,” defined as “sign[s] which direct[ ] attention to a business, commodity, industry or other activity which is sold, offered or conducted elsewhere than on the premises upon which such sign is located, and which may be sold, offered…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Foti v. City of Menlo ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of SunriseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.