Williams v. Harris
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — IIon. II. G. Pepper, Judge. It was not necessary that the abstract set ont the orders extending the time, it was sufficient to merely state their substance as this one does. Ricketts v. Hart, 150 Mo. 64, 51 S. W. 825. Or to use the language of the decision, “A narrative of the several steps is held sufficient as the statute contains within itself the means of protecting this court against imposition.”
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court. — IIon. II. G. Pepper, Judge. It was not necessary that the abstract set ont the orders extending the time, it was sufficient to merely state their substance as this one does. Ricketts v. Hart, 150 Mo. 64, 51 S. W. 825. Or to use the language of the decision, “A narrative of the several steps is held sufficient as the statute contains within itself the means of protecting this court against imposition.” McDonald v. Hover, 142 Mo. 484, 44 S. W. 334; Kincade v. Griffith, 64 Mo. 676; Stewart v. Sparkman, 69 Mo. App. 456; State v. Craft, 164 Mo. 631, 65 S. W.…
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
— This case is brought here by the short form, transcript of the judgment and order granting the appeal. That which purports to be the abstract of the record is as follows:
“ABSTRACT OB RECORD.
“Appellant submits the following abstract as setting forth so much of the record as is necessary to a complete and full understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision.” And thus the abstract ends. Then follows the title:
“BILL OB EXCEPTIONS.”
This bill of exceptions contains the petition, remonstrance and several motions in a public road case, together with evidence of witnesses, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western Storage & Warehouse Co. v. GlasnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Ricketts v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- City of St. Charles ex rel. Budd v. DeemarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Redd v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Walsh v. First National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Bradbury v. KernsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Page Woven Wire Fence Co. v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Cummings v. EilerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.