Legal Opinion

Ricketts v. Hart

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 30, 1899PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Transferred from St. Louis Court of Appeals. (1) In February, 1899, a rehearing was granted in this case with order to put it on April term docket. On March 2, 1899, appellant served copy of abstract of the record on the respondents; it is hied and trial asked on it. Appellant has the right to file an abstract here under the statute and the rules of the court. The clause of the abstract showing the filing of the bill of exceptions is made full. This is the only change made.

Read the full summary

Transferred from St. Louis Court of Appeals. (1) In February, 1899, a rehearing was granted in this case with order to put it on April term docket. On March 2, 1899, appellant served copy of abstract of the record on the respondents; it is hied and trial asked on it. Appellant has the right to file an abstract here under the statute and the rules of the court. The clause of the abstract showing the filing of the bill of exceptions is made full. This is the only change made. (2) The defendants objected merely to the introduction of evidence on the trial, after filing answers and replies, and…

1Per curiam

This cause was heard at the October term, 1898, of this court and an opinion, prepared by Judge Williams, was concurred in by all the members of the court as then constituted.

A rehearing was granted and the cause has been re-argued.

An amended abstract of the record has been filed since the former opinion to meet the objection of respondent that the abstract failed to show the filing of the bill of exceptions. *68As amended it shows that at the June term, 1897, of the Knox Circuit Oourt, plaintiff procured leave of the court to to file a bill of exceptions in vacation on or before ninety days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Kincaid v. GriffithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Stewart v. SparkmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bower v. DanielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Robinson v. FieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. City of St. Charles ex rel. Budd v. DeemarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Graton v. Holliday-Klotz Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. State ex rel. Brown v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API