Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Hale County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1975No. 8618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBINSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. W. L. Thomas, seek a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Hale County, Texas, from cutting a certain barrow ditch to a level which plaintiffs contend would divert the natural flow of runoff water so as to cause flooding of plaintiffs’ land. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary mandatory injunction requiring Hale County to partially fill in the ditch pending final judgment. Plaintiffs appeal from the interlocutory order. Affirmed.

In a hearing on an application for temporary injunction, the only question before the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kostoff v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Upshur Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goldome Credit Corp. v. University Square Apartments, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  2. First Cash, Ltd. v. JQ-Parkdale, LLC, H&JQ PD, LLC, W-SB Staples/SPID, LLC, R-SB Staples/SPID, LLC, Parkdale Income Partners, LP, and Capital Area Retail Development II, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2018
  3. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. FenderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Bradford v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Randall County Commissioners Court v. SherrodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API