Legal Opinion

Metz v. Warrick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

Action upon contractor’s bond. Jury waived and trial by court. Judgment for plaintiff against Warrick, principal in the bond, and judgment in favor of Seifert, Fields and Sigler, the sureties on the bond. From the judgment in favor of these sureties, the plaintiff appealed.

Mr. Warrick, the principal in the bond, had built an addition to a schoolhouse in Consolidated School District No. 1 in Butler County, Missouri, and made some repairs on the main building. He had purchased material from plaintiff to use in doing the work for which plaintiff had not been paid and this suit was brought upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Anderson v. Ripley CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Perkins v. Independent School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Gavigan v. DierkesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. Montague Compressed Air Co. v. City of FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoevelman v. Reorganized School District R2 of Crawford CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Universal Electric Const. Co. of Alabama v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Hawkins v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Layne v. City of WindsorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Goodyear v. Junior College District of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API