Woods v. Bailet
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Allie Woods sued her doctors for operating on her without her informed consent. The trial court dismissed the case because Woods failed to first file a claim with the doctors’ employer, a public development authority organized as a public corporation and created by the City of Seattle. We affirm because we hold that the doctors’ employer was a “local governmental entity” as that term was defined by RCW 4.96.010 at the time this lawsuit was filed, and Woods was required to file a claim before suing the entity or its employees acting within the scope of their employment. We further hold that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Woods v. BailetCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Hyde v. University of Washington Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.