Legal Opinion
Adams v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 27, 2021No. 6:20-cv-03879Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Brogan Adams, ) ) C.A. No. 6:20-3879-HMH Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) OPINION & ORDER ) United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, ) ) ) Defendant. ) The matter is before the court for review of the claim administrator’s decision to deny long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits to Brogan Adams (“Adams”) under a LTD benefits policy governed by ERISA.1 Adams seeks LTD benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) and attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g). (Compl., generally, ECF No. 1); (Am. Joint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Duperry v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- American Council of Life Insurers v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Standard Insurance v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.