Legal Opinion

Frank v. Bernard

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 12, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This suit is brought to restrain infringement of United States letters patent No. 571,121, issued November 10, 1896, to the defendant and Leo Frank, one of the complainants, as assignees of Hubei and Manger, the inventors. The patent is for improvements in match safes. The defendant and complainants were partners in business, trading under the name of Bernard, Frank & Co. Differences arising, the partnership was dissolved on January 12, 1898, by mutual consent; the defendant withdrawing from the firm, and the complainants continuing the business. At the time of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodward v. Boston Lasting Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
  2. Babcock v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
  3. Alvin Mfg. Co. v. ScharlingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1900
  4. Faulks v. KampU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
  5. Marvel Co. v. PearlU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Siemens-Halske Electric Co. v. Duncan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  2. Einson Freeman Co. v. International Folding Paper Box Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  3. Climax Lock & Ventilator Co. v. Ajax Hardware Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1911
  4. Peelle Co. v. RaskinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API