Legal Opinion

Peelle Co. v. Raskin

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 17, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Peelle Company against Tillie Raskin and Joseph Raskin. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD; District Judge.

This is a motion for a preliminary injunction upon a complaint and affidavits alleging infringement of four claims of patent No. 871,735, granted November 19, 1907, upon application filed June 14, 1905, to Joseph Raskin, one of the defendants in this suit. Upon the record on this motion, the defendants do not deny infringement by the device operated at the time of the beginning of this action, and for which suit is brought. They express readi*441ness to avoid infringement in future, and make the statement that they are no longer infringing. They rely upon alleged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alvin Mfg. Co. v. ScharlingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1900
  2. National Conduit Manuf'g Co. v. Connecticut Pipe Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1896
  3. Adee v. ThomasU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1890
  4. Underwood v. WarrenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1884
  5. American Paper Barrel Co. v. LarawayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buckingham Products Co. v. McAleer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API