Nothaf v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
—The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of twenty years.
The state, through the Assistant Attorney General, challenges the authority of the court to consider appellant’s bills of exceptions. They reached the trial judge on the 13th of June and were then approved. Appellant’s counsel, on the day previous, which was Sundáy, notified the Clerk of the Court that he had completed the bills. The final judgment was entered on March 29th, and it thus appears that the bills were given the judge for approval on the seventy-sixth…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Tucker v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Hamill v. SamuelsTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Couturie v. CrespiTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Miffleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Palmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Louis E. Wolcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.