Legal Opinion

Garner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1925No. 8302PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Unlawfully passing a forged check is the offense of which appellant stands convicted. Punishment is fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment contained three counts. The first charged forgery, the second charged that appellant knowingly passed as true a forged instrument, and the third charged that he knowingly had a forged instrument in his possession. The second count alone was submitted. In a motion in arrest of judgment this count was attacked upon the ground that it was duplicitous. Said count charged that appellant did unlawfully and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nothaf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Kleck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Kleck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Edwards v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Botts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Emanuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Chaney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API